January 24th, 2017 - 11:40am
RAMSEY DEMANDS SWIFT GOVERNMENT ACTION FOR STEEL AND ALUMINUM INDUSTRIES
March 2nd, 2018
Click here to see MP Ramsey's press release and letter to Minister Freeland on steel and aluminum trade.
NAFTA'S CHAPTER 11 - CBC Power and Politics
by: Terry Milewski
Participants: Andrew Leslie, Dean Allison, Tracey Ramsey
To watch the Power and Politics video, please click here.
NDP CONCERNED ABOUT REMAINING LOOPHOLES IN LIBERAL LEGISLATION ON THE ARMS TRADE TREATY
March 2nd, 2018
OTTAWA – NDP Foreign Affairs Critic Hélène Laverdière (Laurier- Sainte-Marie) is concerned by remaining loopholes in the Liberal government’s legislation on the Arms Trade Treaty following the adoption of amendments by the Foreign Affairs Committee.
“The NDP strongly supports Canada’s accession to the Arms Trade Treaty,” said Laverdière. “However, even as amended, Liberal Bill C-47 still does not respect the spirit or the letter of the Treaty.”
In February, the Minister of Foreign Affairs confirmed that her government will continue to exclude Canadian arms exports to the United States from all review and reporting. Today, Liberal MPs on the Foreign Affairs Committee voted against an NDP amendment that would require annual reporting of these exports to Parliament. Many Canadian weapons exported to the United States are then exported on as components of weapons systems sold to other countries, including Saudi Arabia – but Canada does not keep records.
“The Arms Trade Treaty prohibits any exclusions, and this includes exports to the United States,” said Laverdière. “Arms and related components sold to the United States are over half of the military equipment that we export globally, but Canadians have zero information about how they are used and where they end up. This is particularly concerning when President Trump has promised to water-down U.S. arms export regulations.”
Bill C-47 won’t address the role of the Canadian Commercial Corporation in brokering weapons sales. “The recent helicopter deal with the government of the Philippines, which is now being examined by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity, is a prime example of the kind of weapons sale that is brokered by the CCC but will not be stopped by Bill C-47,” said Laverdière. “How can this government claim to be a leader on human rights when weapons sales like those to the Philippines will continue without restriction?”
Liberals on the Foreign Affairs Committee also rejected an NDP amendment that would require Canada to reassess existing arms export permits should new information about human rights abuses come to light. “The Arms Trade Treaty has specific language on this. Canada must find a way to deal with reports of misuse of Canadian weapons by governments abroad, like Saudi Arabia. But this Minister is unwilling to meet this standard and reassess
CHAPTER 11 MUST GO
February 22nd, 2018 - 2:52pm
After weeks of pressure from the NDP, it has been reported that Canadian negotiators at the NAFTA table will propose the elimination of Chapter 11 investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions during a meeting with their American counterparts this week. This news comes before the seventh round of NAFTA negotiations are set to resume at the end of February.
“We have repeatedly stood up in the House of Commons calling for the removal of ISDS from NAFTA. Canadians know these provisions are not only regressive, but they also hurt our nation’s sovereignty,” said NDP International Trade Critic Tracey Ramsey. “Canada is the most sued country under ISDS provisions. ISDS is not good for Canada and it must be eliminated.”
Under NAFTA, Canadian taxpayers have been hit with over $219 million in ISDS payouts or settlements, and $95 million in legal fees. These fees are largely due to Canada’s environmental protections that have been democratically legislated. Tens of thousands of Canadians have called on the federal government to remove investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) provisions. New Democrats have heard their voices and it is well past time that the Liberal government remove these harmful provisions.
Please see below, clips from MP Ramsey on ISDS:
LIBERALS OVERDUE ON TRANSPARENCY REGARDING NAFTA NEGOTIATIONS
January 22, 2018
OTTAWA – NDP International Trade Critic, Tracey Ramsey is renewing calls for Minister Freeland to be open and transparent with Canadians as the sixth round of North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) negotiations takes place in Montreal. Ramsey has put forward a motion to the Standing Committee on International Trade inviting the Minister to share the government’s contingency plans if President Trump decides to withdraw from the talks and the free trade agreement.
“The Liberals continue to promise transparency on all trade deals, but Canadians have yet to see this promise fulfilled. Many of our businesses and workers rely on a stable trading relationship with the United States and Mexico, and are very worried,” said Ramsey. “To add to that worry, the government is sending workers mixed messages. Minister Freeland has said they are working on a ‘Plan B’ in case NAFTA talks go sideways, but to date has not been upfront about what that looks like. And her counterpart, Minister Champagne, recently said there was no clear ‘Plan B’ if the deal gets torn up. With so much at stake, Canadians deserve better. We believe the government needs to share their plan with Canadians.”
The Standing Committee will discuss the motion during their first meeting on January 30, 2018 and Ramsey hopes the committee and its Liberal majority will be open to her motion.
NAFTA TRANSPARENCY NEEDED NOW MORE THAN EVER
January 11, 2018
In light of recent news reports, NDP International Trade Critic, Tracey Ramsey is once again renewing calls for transparency from the Liberal government on the status of NAFTA trade renegotiations. The Liberal government must be upfront on how they plan to directly support Canadian businesses and workers if the deal collapses.
“From the very beginning of NAFTA renegotiations, we have urged the Liberals to be open and clear about their plans and priorities with this trade deal. Yet, despite the Liberals’ campaign promises to be open and transparent, they have left Canadians completely in the dark,” said Ramsey. “Many Canadian businesses and jobs, in all sectors, are affected by NAFTA, and it is simply not enough for Minister Freeland to give Canadians vague platitudes that her government will provide a ‘whole of government preparation’. What does that even mean?”
Last August before the NAFTA renegotiations began, Ramsey, together with her opposition colleagues, were able to compel Minister Freeland to appear before the Standing Committee on International Trade to be transparent to the committee and to Canadians about her government’s priorities on NAFTA.
“Minister Freeland stated this week that her government has contingency plans in place if Trump withdraws from NAFTA, and that they are ‘prepared for the worst’,” added Ramsey. “It is time the Minister reveal what those plans are, to provide leadership and stability for Canadian workers. Auto workers, agricultural producers, manufacturers, retailers, health care workers, transportation providers, and all affected Canadians deserve to know what supports will be in place.”
During his campaign to become President of the United States, Trump threatened to pull the U.S. out of the 23 year old trade deal, and as we draw closer to the sixth round of renegotiations in Montreal, President Trump is expected to officially withdraw from the trade deal by the end of the month. This will leave many Canadians, who rely on trade with the U.S. for work, in a difficult situation."
The fourth round of NAFTA renegotiations concluded earlier this week, and despite a somewhat slow, frustrating and unproductive first three rounds, this last round was fraught with extreme protectionist demands, threats of abandonment and a great deal of misinformation from the United States.
President Donald Trump continues to bully his way through these trade negotiations - this is the definition of bad faith bargaining – he has used every opportunity to threaten the United States’ withdrawal from NAFTA.
The Americans’ fervent attacks on our manufacturing, automotive, agricultural, cultural, energy, forestry and aerospace sectors are unacceptable.
After threatening for to do so for months, this week the Trump Administration called for a definitive end to Canada’s Supply Management system and they demanded further access to our dairy, egg and poultry markets.
Watch my speech about Supply Management here
Watch my question about Supply Management here
The U.S. also demanded that vehicles made in the NAFTA countries contain at least 50% American content. We know this proposal will backfire as companies will simply pay the low 2.5% tariff on imported goods. This does nothing to ensure content regionally sourced or good-paying Canadian jobs are protected.
Watch my question about protecting Canadian jobs here
The Canadian government cannot force the Americans to ‘play nice’, however they have a responsibility to defend Canadian values, protect our jobs and to stand up to these intimidation tactics.
New Democrats know that Canadians don’t want to continue to placate this bully – they need real leadership and a show of strength.
I represent a rural riding, one that has the most acreage under glass due to the amount of greenhouses. We sit right on the Canada-US border; and I can tell you that I have heard from many of my constituents, for whom NAFTA and the cross border relationship is vital.
My constituents, like many Canadians are worried about their jobs, their businesses and our communities. Over the life of NAFTA, the Windsor automotive industry, one that I worked in for 20 years, has been hit hard by unfair labour practices, unbalanced government procurement policies, weak environmental standards, agricultural manipulation, and unethical, unjustifiable and unequitable distribution of power. NAFTA serves corporate interests and not the people of Canada, the U.S. or Mexico.
Whether NAFTA negotiations take five months, ten months or more, what matters is the result. The Liberal government has an obligation to get a deal that is fair for Canadians and I was glad to see the pace of these negotiations slow. It is crucial that our negotiating team have more time to consult with stakeholders and Canadians. Hopefully this will mean that the Liberal government will be more transparent with Parliamentarians and Canadians going forward. The next round will begin on November 17th, and Canadians need to be prepared for more intimidation tactics from the U.S. I also will be prepared to hold our government to account and force them to stand up to these heavy handed measures.
What New Democrats are looking for from NAFTA:
· Protection of jobs
· Protection our supply management system
· Improvement and equalization of Labour rights and standards
· Chapters on Gender Equality and Indigenous Rights
· The elimination of Chapter 11 – ISDS provisions
· Strengthening enforcement of Environmental Standards and protection against sale of our water
· Elimination of NAFTA’s Energy Proportionality provisions
· Protection of our Intellectual Property and Privacy rights
· Equal access to government procurement
Canadians deserve a better deal and we cannot allow the fear of no deal, interfere with our need to get the best possible deal. I believe that NAFTA in its current form doesn’t work for Canadians – but we have a unique opportunity to change all of that. We have the chance to promote more sustainable and equitably shared economic prosperity.
We have the chance to establish a truly progressive, fair trade agreement that is for all Canadians, all workers – not just one that drastically increases the profits for corporations. It must tackle things like currency manipulation, labour rights, gender and indigenous equality, human rights and environmental protections. It can establish a new standard for consultation, inclusivity, collaboration and transparency. Above all else, the needs of people must be the priority for NAFTA, we can accept and should accept no less.
NDP Critic for International Trade, Tracey Ramsey, made the following statement:
“The fourth round of NAFTA renegotiations begins today and Canadians have yet to see substantial progress on this important trade deal.
The Liberal government is failing to stand-up for Canadians against unfair tactics used by the Trump administration. The administration continues to bargain in bad faith by failing to provide clear proposals, threatening to pull out of the deal and continuing to bully our industries such as dairy, softwood and aerospace. The U.S. has also threatened to serve Canada with protectionist policies surrounding rules of origin.
Now, the Prime Minister himself is in Washington to try and save this deal. Canadians need the negotiating team to secure a strong commitment to level the playing field for working people, ensure the strong future of our supply managed sector and to maintain our ability to implement environmental policies.
It is imperative for the federal government to eliminate Chapter 11’s ISDS provisions in this round as well. The Lone Pine Resources arbitration case currently being heard in Toronto is a perfect example of how NAFTA Chapter 11 has undermined our national sovereignty. Lone Pine is suing Canada for trying to protect our water in Quebec.
NAFTA can and must improve the lives of all North Americans, but to do so it must be transparent, inclusive and forward-looking. It must address important issues like climate change, workers’ rights, and the millions of Canadian jobs at stake. The Liberal government has the opportunity to change this key trade deal and make it about people, instead of corporate profits.”
MP Tracey Ramsey also spoke on CBC Windsor Morning Radio, please click here to listen.
The third round of NAFTA renegotiations just wrapped up the other day in Ottawa.
Despite the fact that negotiators have met three times, the public still does not have answers to key decisions that will impact Canadians daily lives.
In this past week of negotiations in Ottawa there were numerous occasions where I was able to stand up in the House of Commons to ask the government for some transparency about NAFTA during question period. You can review my questions by clicking on the links below.
And I was proud to be joined by four other colleagues this week during question period who also questioned the government on the lack of clarity during these renegotiations. MPs Ruth-Ellen Brosseau (14:25:43), Pierre Nantel (14:45:45), Cheryl Hardcastle (14:51:33) and Linda Duncan (14:52:59).
I also engaged with a variety of key stakeholders and civil society organizations where I joined a panel discussion on NAFTA at the University of Ottawa this past weekend. Which you can review on Trade Justice Network`s website.
I am frustrated that the Liberal government will not be transparent on NAFTA issues and instead the public must rely on vague statements from the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Chief Negotiator or rumours that are leaked to the media.
NAFTA has a major impact on the air we breathe, the water we drink, the food we eat, the goods we make, buy and sell, our jobs – everything in our lives are impacted.
The history of NAFTA highlights an agreement negotiated in secret – behind closed doors, by the wealthy and for the wealthy. I would like to be able to say that this process has changed, but it has not. Under Chapter 11’s Investor State Dispute Resolution process, or the weak unenforceable environmental and labour side agreements and energy proportionality clauses, big corporations have benefitted greatly, while the people of Canada have been an afterthought.
So, as the third round of negotiations comes to a close and we look to what the fourth round will deliver, my New Democrat colleagues and I will keep working hard to ensure the Liberals do not fail Canadians on our nation’s most important trading partnership! We know better is possible and we can achieve it together.